After the initial screening, your application moves to the Scientific Quality Review stage where PMC evaluates the journal information, policies and content. If your journal fails to at this stage, you will be deemed ineligible to reapply before 2 years are up.
Read more about the scientific and editorial quality assessment by PMC. If you pass the above two assessments, you then move to the Technical Evaluation stage. At this point, you will be asked to fill out a technical evaluation checklist and submit a set of sample files for 25 articles.
The files to be deposited for each article include:. All sample files have to meet the minimum data criteria set out by PMC. This is mandatory. Failure to meet it will result in rejection. Files will also be evaluated on the accuracy of presentation and adherence to Delivery specifications. There are three different types of agreements, you will need to choose the one you are eligible for.
Read more about Participation Agreements and Options. If there are repeated or serious errors in your content files, your journal could be rejected at this stage. University Publishing. Home Main Website. Finally, even the non-fraudulent papers published by genuine journals and that report on actual scientific research should be approached with a level of skepticism. PubMed will list nutrition studies based solely on food questionnaires, where participants are asked to remember how many eggs they ate in the past month.
PubMed will also list exploratory studies where the blood of participants was looked at from every possible molecular angle to see if something would turn up positive. And PubMed will list studies where an intervention was not compared to a control group. The results from all of these studies are bound to be questionable. In science, reliability generally emerges from a body of evidence made up of rigorous studies that end up pointing in the same direction.
Take-home message: -PubMed is a website that searches databases of life science publications like the MEDLINE database, which contains over 32 million publications -PubMed lists good scientific papers, but also papers on fake sciences like homeopathy, fraudulent papers, radical hypotheses, and papers on low-quality studies -Just because a paper can be found on PubMed does not mean it is a good scientific paper. Enter your keywords. Sign-Up Here. Not all of them pass the sniff test. Jonathan Jarry M.
Health and Nutrition. General Science. Use caution when interpreting the results of a Medical Subject Heading search, as older records are not typically re-indexed after a new heading is added to the thesaurus. PubMed by Year is lashed together with bailing wire and jQuery. Google Charts is used to draw the charts and responsive layout is made easier with Bootstrap. You can find the source code for this application at GitHub. Please note that the information provided here comes ultimately from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and is subject to the terms listed under their Disclaimer and Copyright notice.
Feel free to use this tool as you wish, but if you use PubMed by Year for publication, I'd appreciate a citation: Sperr E. PubMed by Year [Internet]. Want to have even more fun with tools like this?
0コメント