Civil systems vary widely, both in procedure and substantive law, so conducting research on a particular nation's civil law system should include looking at that nation's specific system of law, but they do have some trademark characteristics.
Nations with civil law systems have comprehensive, frequently updated legal codes. Most importantly, case law is a secondary source in these jurisdictions. France and Germany are two examples of countries with a civil law system.
Common law systems , while they often have statutes, rely more on precedent, judicial decisions that have already been made. Common law systems are adversarial, rather than investigatory, with the judge moderating between two opposing parties. The legal system in the United States is a common law system with the exception of Louisiana, which has a mix of civil and common law.
Customary law systems are based on patterns of behavior or customs that have come to be accepted as legal requirements or rules of conduct within a particular country. The laws of customary legal systems are usually unwritten and are often dispensed by elders, passed down through generations. As such, customary law research depends greatly on the use of secondary sources. What is customary international law? Both treaty law and customary international law are sources of international law.
Treaties, such as the four Geneva Conventions of , are written conventions in which States formally establish certain rules. Treaties bind only those States which have expressed their consent to be bound by them, usually through ratification. Customary international law, on the other hand, derives from " a general practice accepted as law ". Such practice can be found in official accounts of military operations but is also reflected in a variety of other official documents, including military manuals, national legislation and case law.
The requirement that this practice be " accepted as law " is often referred to as " opinio juris ". This characteristic sets practices required by law apart from practices followed as a matter of policy, for example. Why was the study on customary international humanitarian law carried out?
Rules of customary international law are unwritten and research into State practice is required to determine their existence. For this reason, the 26th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, held in December , requested the ICRC to carry out a study in order to identify, and consequently facilitate the application, of existing rules of customary international humanitarian law.
Therefore, the study does not create new rules of international humanitarian law but rather seeks to provide the most accurate snapshot of existing rules of customary international humanitarian law.
What does customary international humanitarian law add to existing treaty law? While the four Geneva Conventions of have been ratified universally, other treaties of international humanitarian law have not.
This is the case, for example, of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions. The study shows, however, that a number of rules and principles contained in these treaties also exist under customary law, such as a significant number of rules governing the conduct of hostilities and the treatment of persons not or no longer taking a direct part in hostilities. As part of customary international law, these rules and principles are applicable to all States regardless of their adherence to relevant treaties.
In addition, despite the fact that most contemporary armed conflicts are non-international in nature, treaty law covering such conflicts remains fairly limited mainly common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II. The study shows, however, that there exist an important number of customary rules of international humanitarian law that define in much greater detail than treaty law the obligations of parties to a non-international armed conflict.
This is notably the case with rules on the conduct of hostilities. For example, while treaty law does not expressly prohibit attacks on civilian objects in non-international armed conflicts, such a prohibition has developed under customary international law.
The study also shows that a large number of customary rules of international humanitarian law are applicable to both international and non-international armed conflicts. As a result, for the application of these rules, the qualification of the conflict as international or non-international is not relevant. These rules apply in any armed conflict. Finally, customary international humanitarian law can also be useful in the case of coalition warfare.
Contemporary armed conflicts often involve a coalition of States. When the States composing such a coalition do not have the same treaty based obligations because they have not ratified the same treaties, customary international humanitarian law represents those rules that are common to all members of the coalition. These rules can be relied upon as a minimum standard for drafting common rules of engagement or for adopting targeting policies. It should be borne in mind, however, that these customary rules cannot weaken the applicable treaty obligations of individual coalition members.
What difference does the study on customary international humanitarian law make for victims? Customary international humanitarian law fills in certain gaps in protection provided to victims of armed conflict by treaty law. These gaps result either from the lack of ratification of relevant treaties or from the lack of detailed rules on non-international armed conflicts in treaty law. As it identifies the rules of customary international humanitarian law, the study helps to ensure better knowledge of the applicable rules.
Awareness of these rules by those who are required to apply them ensures greater respect for the law. In contrast, private international law deals with controversies between private persons.
These controversies arise out of situations which have a significant relationship to multiple nations. In recent years the line between public and private international law has became increasingly uncertain. Issues of private international law may also implicate issues of public international law, and many matters of private international law have substantial international significance. International Law includes the basic, classic concepts of law in national legal systems i.
It also includes substantive law , procedural law , due process , and remedies. The following are major substantive fields of international law:. Customary law and conventional law are primary sources of international law. Customary international law results when states follow certain practices generally and consistently out of a sense of legal obligation. Recently the customary law was codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Conventional international law is derived from International conventions and may take any form that the contracting parties agree upon.
These contracting parties, however, may not violate the rules of international law.
0コメント